YQ Bluenose Ted R

Ted Robinson said:
I did as you suggested
I believe the elevator of the deck level was caused by me trying to keep the frames tight to the keel instead of firmly anchored to the bottom of the jig level.
I will reassemble take some photos and post them prior to glueing.
View attachment 441891
Thank you
Ted
Click to expand...
Maybe it's also a good idea to follow Dan's suggestion to overlay the offending frames on the appropriate drawing to check the geometry of these frames, to make sure they are according to drawing. Maybe also check a couple more, like from 44 to 49.
Again, take your time; it's gonna bite you if you don't ( personal experience...)
 
It's tricky, the frames have to be bottomed out on the keel notches as well as fully seated in the jig not to mention they must be in the correct order. My biggest concern during fit up was how well the frames seated in the keel notches. Because of this I spent probably 2 or more days trying to sand the fit to just the right amount where they pushed home with a comfortable resistance not too hard not too easy.
 
RDN1954 said:
Maybe it's also a good idea to follow Dan's suggestion to overlay the offending frames on the appropriate drawing to check the geometry of these frames, to make sure they are according to drawing. Maybe also check a couple more, like from 44 to 49.
Again, take your time; it's gonna bite you if you don't ( personal experience...)
Click to expand...
I'm following both yours and Dan's advice. The frames all compare well. See attached photos of the frames in a stack. Next I'll reinstall, take new photos and ask what you guys think. The bottom tops of the frames are a little worse for wear and tear.
Than both of you again for your assistance

Ted
IMG20240415182332.jpgIMG20240415182323.jpg
 
Ted at this point all I know to do is show you what mine looked like at this stage. I may have had a +- 1mm deviation. Unless someone else has some more suggestions, you will just have to decide how you want to proceed on this one.

41-49.jpg

When it comes time to lay in your upper deck crossbeam supports, I think piece #103. you may run into some additional sanding/filling requirements to achieve the proper elevation for your deck. It is difficult to tell from your photos though. Good luck!
 
Daniel20 said:
Ted at this point all I know to do is show you what mine looked like at this stage. I may have had a +- 1mm deviation. Unless someone else has some more suggestions, you will just have to decide how you want to proceed on this one.

View attachment 442086

When it comes time to lay in your upper deck crossbeam supports, I think piece #103. you may run into some additional sanding/filling requirements to achieve the proper elevation for your deck. It is difficult to tell from your photos though. Good luck!
Click to expand...
I was thinking the same thing. I believe this is close as I can get it. I had discussed getting replacement with Heinrich but it wast expensive. The imperfections will get me further training when correcting. Im sure the model will be beautiful when finished. I'm learning and having a blast.
Ps I did get a strake out and checked the fairing and d xk levels. Close but not perfect.
Thanks again.
Ted
 
Ted Robinson said:
Frames in place but not glued. I think it's good this time. Confirmation would be appreciated.View attachment 442046View attachment 442047View attachment 442048
Click to expand...
Ted Robinson said:
I was thinking the same thing. I believe this is close as I can get it. I had discussed getting replacement with Heinrich but it wast expensive. The imperfections will get me further training when correcting. Im sure the model will be beautiful when finished. I'm learning and having a blast.
Ps I did get a strake out and checked the fairing and d xk levels. Close but not perfect.
Thanks again.
Ted
Click to expand...
Ted Robinson said:
I was thinking the same thing. I believe this is close as I can get it. I had discussed getting replacement with Heinrich but it wast expensive. The imperfections will get me further training when correcting. Im sure the model will be beautiful when finished. I'm learning and having a blast.
Ps I did get a strake out and checked the fairing and d xk levels. Close but not perfect.
Thanks again.
Ted
Click to expand...
Eventually the deck beams will sit on top of four longerons, parts 101 and 102, if I'm not mistaken. These parts sit against the inside of the frames and should be aligned with the transition of the frame, forming the notch. The deck beams are sitting against the fwd face of the frames. So slight deviations to nominal shouldn't be a big bother and, as Dan mentioned, if need be, you can remove some of the offending material.
 
RDN1954 said:
Eventually the deck beams will sit on top of four longerons, parts 101 and 102, if I'm not mistaken. These parts sit against the inside of the frames and should be aligned with the transition of the frame, forming the notch. The deck beams are sitting against the fwd face of the frames. So slight deviations to nominal shouldn't be a big bother and, as Dan mentioned, if need be, you can remove some of the offending material.
Click to expand...
Thank you,
I pressed on. Everything you see is glued. It was per worth while to remove 41 to 48. I think it's pretty close now.
Should be posting a cathedral shot tomorrow.
Thanks again to everyone for all the advice.
Ted
1713316517001444882726029394111.jpg17133165398857434600952122768240.jpg17133165550597481877021358093598.jpg
 
Here's everything up to frame 49. If I had been offered for a lit to come out this good from the start I would have taken it.
I know it's rough and doesn't measure up to the standards of that w site but I'm happy and a little proud.
It's so much better than my first model the Virginia Swift.IMG20240417120014.jpgIMG20240417115956.jpgIMG20240417115951.jpgIMG20240417115946.jpgIMG20240417115935.jpg
 
Ted Robinson said:
Here's everything up to frame 49. If I had been offered for a lit to come out this good from the start I would have taken it.
I know it's rough and doesn't measure up to the standards of that w site but I'm happy and a little proud.
It's so much better than my first model the Virginia Swift.View attachment 442305View attachment 442306View attachment 442307View attachment 442308View attachment 442309
Click to expand...
A big step to make the Cathedral-view, Ted. For sure you can be proud.
Regards, Peter
 
RDN1954 said:
This little bugger can be a pain. It's complex and one needs to pay careful attention to its position on those keel extensions.
Good luck, Ted
Click to expand...

RDN1954 said:
This little bugger can be a pain. It's complex and one needs to pay careful attention to its position on those keel extensions.
Good luck, Ted
Click to expand...
How correct you are. This really fiddley.
17134682016672162443486267758563.jpg
 
I realize the tail ends of the transom extensions are not straight, but would it be feasible to glue the assembly together like I have I the photo?
Thanks,
Ted1713481587587718397018885744312.jpg17134816504373949102373423707535.jpg
 
It's very much a personal preference, but I made a subassambly out of this one, minus frame 55 and trimmed it before attachment to the keel extensions.

IMG_2390.jpeg

IMG_2391.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top