- Joined
- Sep 23, 2021
- Messages
- 137
- Points
- 113
While my build is very much stalled in its box, all I am able to do at the moment is to make notes from Longridge’s book of the Cutty Sark, go through the plans and look at other build logs that I have found for when I do finally get the model underway. One of the things that I do want to do on my model is to sheath the hull. So, this is an interesting subject to throw out to fellow modellers for advice.
Most of the models of the CS that I have looked at have been sheathed with copper tiles or tape but Jock Willis’ original spec. for the Cutty Sark states “Yellow Metal Sheathing. Vessel to be sheathed from Keel to 18 ft water mark on top of paper and tar, sheathing to be smoothly put on, sheets to be 22, 24, 26 oz. metal”. So, the ship was sheathed in brass, not copper, from the boatyard. The yellow metal used at the time was a brass alloy known as “Muntz Metal” which is a 60/40 copper/zinc alloy. When you look at pictures of the Cutty Sark’s hull, the plates are the typical brassy gold/green in colour. So, copper plates or "copper” colour are actually wrong for the model. If I am keeping true to the ship, brass is the correct way to go - but how?
I found some useful images on the web here <
Photos of Cutty Sark in Greenwich, the hull under her glass roof (modelships.de) >
They show some nice detail of the plates and the brassy colour of the sheathing but it is also interesting to see that the hull plates show very little detail (seams and nails barely visible) from even a moderate distance away. Each plate is lapped under the top edge of the plate below and under the leading edge of the trailing plate but from a distance, the sheathing looks like it is almost continuous because it is so thin and smooth.
Plate/tape size (and thickness)?
The plates that were originally used on the CS were 4’x15” (122x38cm) and about 32-35 mil ( 0.8-0.9mm) thick with a tar and paper backing of ¼” thickness. Scaling the dimensions (including the backing) down would give a plate size of 16 x 5mm and a thickness of 0.09mm (give or take). When the ship was restored they used 120x40cm plates so pretty much the same. Two or three coats of paint (primer + metalized paint) would be around 0.08-0.1mm which would be the same as plates (so perhaps Billings is right to paint the hull?). Obviously the gain is that by adding plates it will give a more realistic metal and tile pattern appearance (but in reality, scaled down it would be near impossible to see the seam lines and nail heads).
I have not found anybody who sells brass photo-etch tiles or foil tape. The only plates I have seen are copper and the closest match are ones from Amati which are 17x5x0.1mm.
Any comments about “brassing” the CS from fellow modellers are welcome! If anyone has “brassed” a hull rather than used the usual copper tiles/tape I would be really pleased to hear about how you went about that. Does anyone know of any sources for brass plates? I could make my own but I really don’t want to go to that level of time and effort unless I am really convinced that I should!
Most of the models of the CS that I have looked at have been sheathed with copper tiles or tape but Jock Willis’ original spec. for the Cutty Sark states “Yellow Metal Sheathing. Vessel to be sheathed from Keel to 18 ft water mark on top of paper and tar, sheathing to be smoothly put on, sheets to be 22, 24, 26 oz. metal”. So, the ship was sheathed in brass, not copper, from the boatyard. The yellow metal used at the time was a brass alloy known as “Muntz Metal” which is a 60/40 copper/zinc alloy. When you look at pictures of the Cutty Sark’s hull, the plates are the typical brassy gold/green in colour. So, copper plates or "copper” colour are actually wrong for the model. If I am keeping true to the ship, brass is the correct way to go - but how?
I found some useful images on the web here <
Photos of Cutty Sark in Greenwich, the hull under her glass roof (modelships.de) >
They show some nice detail of the plates and the brassy colour of the sheathing but it is also interesting to see that the hull plates show very little detail (seams and nails barely visible) from even a moderate distance away. Each plate is lapped under the top edge of the plate below and under the leading edge of the trailing plate but from a distance, the sheathing looks like it is almost continuous because it is so thin and smooth.
Plate/tape size (and thickness)?
The plates that were originally used on the CS were 4’x15” (122x38cm) and about 32-35 mil ( 0.8-0.9mm) thick with a tar and paper backing of ¼” thickness. Scaling the dimensions (including the backing) down would give a plate size of 16 x 5mm and a thickness of 0.09mm (give or take). When the ship was restored they used 120x40cm plates so pretty much the same. Two or three coats of paint (primer + metalized paint) would be around 0.08-0.1mm which would be the same as plates (so perhaps Billings is right to paint the hull?). Obviously the gain is that by adding plates it will give a more realistic metal and tile pattern appearance (but in reality, scaled down it would be near impossible to see the seam lines and nail heads).
I have not found anybody who sells brass photo-etch tiles or foil tape. The only plates I have seen are copper and the closest match are ones from Amati which are 17x5x0.1mm.
Any comments about “brassing” the CS from fellow modellers are welcome! If anyone has “brassed” a hull rather than used the usual copper tiles/tape I would be really pleased to hear about how you went about that. Does anyone know of any sources for brass plates? I could make my own but I really don’t want to go to that level of time and effort unless I am really convinced that I should!